When it comes to a commercial mortgage loan, the most important issue to most borrowers is not, "What is the interest rate?". Most banks and conduits offer interest rates that are within 0.25% of each other. Instead, commercial mortgage borrowers are most concerned about, "How large of a commercial loan can I get?"
In the past, the size of your new commercial loan was limited by either the Loan-To-Value Ratio or the Debt Service Coverage Ratio. For example, the lender might say, "We will lend up to 75% loan-to-value, but the loan must also satisfy a 1.25 debt service coverage ratio.
In the past, it was the debt service coverage ratio that was the true limiting ratio. For example, a lender might say, "I see that you are buying this commercial property for $10 million. In terms of loan-to-value ratio, you could qualify for a loan of $7.5 million. However, in order to satisfy the 1.25 debt service coverage requirement, the largest loan we can make you is $7.1 million (71% LTV)."
Unfortunately, there is now a third sheriff in town, and this new ratio is limiting commercial loan sizes even more. This new underwriting ratio in commercial real estate finance is called the Debt Yield Ratio, and this ratio is limiting large commercial loans to just 58% to 63% loan-to-value.
The Debt Yield Ratio is defined as the Net Operating Income (NOI) divided by the first mortgage debt (loan) amount, times 100%. For example, let's say that a commercial property has a NOI of $437,000 per year, and some conduit lender has been asked to make a new first mortgage loan in the amount of $6,000,000. Four-hundred thirty-seven thousand dollars divided by $6,000,000 is .073. Multiplied by 100% produces a Debt Yield Ratio of 7.3%. What this means is that the conduit lender would enjoy a 7.3% cash-on-cash return on its money if it foreclosed on the commercial property on Day One.
Please notice that this new Debt Yield Ratio does not even look at the cap rate used to value the property. It does not consider the interest rate on the commercial lender's loan, nor does it factor in the amortization of the lender's loan; e.g., 20 years versus 25 years. The only factor that the Debt Yield Ratio considers is how large of a loan the commercial lender is advancing compared to the property's NOI. This is intentional. Commercial lenders and CMBS investors want to make sure that low interest rates, low caps rates, and high leverage never again push real estate valuations to sky-high levels.
So what is an acceptable Debt Yield Ratio? For many years the answer was 10.0%. This was the lowest number that most conduit lenders were using to determine the maximum size of their advances. In our example above, the subject commercial property generated a NOI of $437,000. Four-hundred thirty-seven dollars divided by 0.10 (10% expressed as a decimal) would suggest a maximum loan amount of $4,370,000.
Typically a Debt Yield Ratio of 10% produces a loan-to-value ratio between 58% to 63%, about the maximum level of leverage that the current CMBS B-piece buyers would allow.
That being said, the market is ravenous for commercial mortgage backed securities. Competition for product, coupled the market's voracious for appetite for commercial mortgage-backed bonds, is putting downward pressure on the Debt Yield Ratio. If the loan is large and the commercial property unusually desirable, conduits are making commercial loans today with Debt Yield Ratio's as low as 9.0%. Average deals, however, are still limited to a minimum Debt Yield Ratio of 10.0%
It is the money center banks and investment banks originating fixed-rate, conduit-style commercial loans that are using the new Debt Yield Ratio. Commercial banks, lending for their own portfolio, and most other commercial lenders have NOT adopted the Debt Yield Ratio. The banks need to actually close loans.
You will notice in my definition of the Debt Yield Ratio that I used as the "debt" only the amount of the first mortgage debt. The reason why I threw in the word "first mortgage" is because more and more new conduit deals involve a mezzanine loan at the time of origination. The existence of a sizable mezzanine loan behind the first mortgage does NOT affect the size of the conduit's new first mortgage, at least as far as this ratio is concerned.
Will conduit's ever accept a Debt Yield ratio of less than 10.0%? Yes, if the property is very attractive, and it is located in a primary market, like Washington, DC; New York; Boston; or Los Angeles - an area where cap rates are exceedingly low (4.5% to 5%) - a conduit lender might consider a Debt Yield as low as 9.0%.
Debt yields are also coming down. The CMBS market is ravenous for commercial mortgage loans, so debt yield ratios of 9% are becoming commonplace. I predict that within 18 months the minimum-acceptable Debt Yield Ratio will finally stabilze at around 8.0%. (George's note: I recently - 11/25/15 - updated this popular blog article, and so far 9.0% is still as low as conduits will accept. Time will tell whether Debt Yield Ratios ever get as low as 8.0%.)
Why did the conduit industry start to use the Debt Yield Ratio? For over 50 years commercial real estate lenders determined the maximum size of their commercial mortgage loans using the Debt Service Coverage Ratio. For example, a commercial lender might insist that the Net Operating Income (NOI) of the property be at least 125% of the proposed annual debt service (loan payments).
But then, in the mid-2000's, a problem started to develop. Bonds investors were ravenous for commercial mortgage-backed securities, driving yields waaaaay down. As a result, commercial property owners could regularly obtain long-term, fixed rate conduit loans in the range of 6% to 6.75%.
At the same time, dozens of conduits were locked in a bitter battle to win more conduit loan business. Each promised to advance more dollars than the other. Loan-to-value ratio's crept up from 70% to 75% and then to 80% ... and then up to 82%! Commercial property investors could achieve a historically huge amount of leverage, while locking in a long-term, fixed-rate loan at a very attractive rate.
Not surprisingly, the demand for standard commercial real estate (the four basic food groups - multifamily, office, retail, industrial) soared. Cap rates plummeted, and prices bubbled-up to sky-high levels.
When the bubble popped, conduit lenders found that many of their loans were significantly upside down. The borrowers owed far more than the properties were worth. The lenders swore to never let this happen again. The CMBS industry therefore adopted a new financial ratio - the Debt Yield Ratio - to determine the maximum size of their commercial real estate loans.
I hope you enjoyed my plain-English method of teaching commercial real estate finance (CREF). This training is totally free. To receive similar articles in the future, please click the gray box below:
Do you actually need a commercial loan right now? Stop winding up and actually throw that punch! :-) It will take you just four minutes to complete your mini-app on C-Loans. Then you can submit your commercial loan to 750 different commercial lenders with just one click. And C-Loans.com is free!







Commercial loans from life insurance companies typically offer the lowest interest rates and the best terms in all of commercial real estate finance. Most commercial real estate loans from life insurance companies have a fixed rate, and these wonderful loans typically have a term of either 5, 7, or 10 years. The interest rate is usually 25 to 37.5 basis points cheaper than those from any CMBS lender (conduit) or major bank.






A bank is never going to finance a gentlemen's club, which is just a fancy term for a nudie bar. Nor would a bank finance an adult bookstore or a lingerie and marital aid store. Can you just visualize the headlines? First Neighborhood Bank Forecloses on the Pink Feather Lounge! Bank Vice President seen collecting the cover charge at the door. This is NOT gonna happen. Ha-ha!

In late 2014 I wrote a blog article suggesting that 

A 


A 



Today's article is far more important than a mere training lesson about some archane financial ratio. The gold-to-silver ratio actually explains much of the history of the modern world. Prepare to learn a ton.
Why was silver so relatively precious in India and China? Why was gold valued so relatively little? The average person in India and China in the old days was dirt poor. There was no way on Earth that the average person in India would ever be able to save up enough wealth to own a gold coin or to ever conduct a trade in gold. Silver was the currency of the people, and the demand for it in India and China was immense. 

Later the Phoenicians (Lebannon) and the Carthaginians (North Africa), who were famous sailors and sea trading nations, controlled the Mediterranean Sea. The Carthaginian traders made an enormous profit carrying the East-West trade, with which they could build fighting ships and hire huge land armies.
But then Rome got smart. Rome built a fleet of its own and destroyed the fleet of Carthage. By doing so, Rome claimed lordship of the seas and the East-West trade.
But the Venetians were envious. They too were a sea faring power, and they coveted the East-West trade. When the knights and soldiers of Fourth Crusade (booty seekers, in reality) needed transport to the Holy Land, only Venice possessed a sufficiently large fleet. "We'll transport your army to the Holy Land, if you do us a little favor. There is an irritating little city (little?) along the way that we would like for you to sack. They have lots of booty inside." So the Christian crusaders stormed the Christian city of Constantinople and slew all of the inhabitants. Now unbelievably rich with booty, the noble crusaders decided not to bother with the Holy Land, and they went home. In the process, little Venice became the uncontested master of the Mediterranean Sea and the financial capital of the world.
What goes around, comes around. For hundreds of years, the Byzantines had protected Venice (the ungrateful bums) and the rest of Europe from the Ottoman Turks. While Constantinople eventually recovered from the sack by the Crusaders and repopulated, it was never able to regain its former strength. In 1453 Constantinople fell for a second and final time to the Ottomans, and Venice would spend the next 200+ years fighting the Ottomans for control of the Mediterranean all by themselves. When the Venetians were devastated by two plagues, the Ottoman Turks destroyed the last of Venetian fleets and took over control of the Mediterranean Sea, along with the gold-silver trade. This control of the East-West trade was a high-water mark in Muslim history.
But it was the Dutch who had the foresight to build trading colonies along the west coast of Africa, and they founded Johannesburg in South Africa. Soon the Dutch controlled the Indian Ocean and the East-West trade. Amsterdam in tiny little Holland became the financial capital of the world. If you wanted to take a company public or if you wanted to borrow a huge sum of money - perhaps to fight a war - your most likely first stop was a Dutch bank.
Eventually, however, the British Navy was able to wear down the Dutch Navy and gain control of the seas and the East-West trade - one time by sailing into Holland's chief harbor and sinking the entire Dutch fleet before war had even been declared. The huge profits of the gold-silver trade moved to London, and London became the financial capital of the world until the end of World War I. London's investments banks (they were called 


You're an English ship captain in London, and the year is 1772. You have made seven successful trading voyages to India, and when you successfully brought your return cargo home to London, you made your financial backers absolutely stinking rich. They put up 2,000 pounds to finance your voyage, and they sold your return cargo of silks, spices, and gold for 37,000 pounds.



A few years ago, Alicia, who was running C-Loans at the time, called up a guy named Alan Dunn and said, "Alan, I'm about to make your whole day. Do you remember that hyperlink entitled 
